Africa’s ambition to build a more integrated digital trading system under the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) is facing a challenge that is less about technology than the ability of governments to make national customs systems legally and technically interoperable.
The issue is visible at borders across the continent, where a truck can arrive carrying goods whose declaration has already been processed digitally on one side, only for the same information to be entered manually again on the other. Customs authorities may have access to information about the cargo, consignee and duties paid, but that information often does not automatically cross the border with the shipment.
Equatorial Guinea’s Justa Mbasogo Makes History at FIDE Chess Olympiad
The result is a disconnect between Africa’s increasingly sophisticated digital systems and the physical movement of goods. As Ludovic Thanay, Senior Vice President of Sales at Webb Fontaine, argues, the central challenge of Africa’s digital trade era is closing the gap between rules negotiated at the continental level and the systems operating at individual border posts.
In February 2025, the African Union adopted eight annexes to the AfCFTA Protocol on Digital Trade, covering areas including cross-border data transfers, digital identities, digital payments and emerging technologies. Customs cooperation already has a legal foundation under the AfCFTA Protocol on Trade in Goods, including provisions covering customs cooperation, mutual administrative assistance and trade facilitation. However, many of these commitments still need to be ratified and incorporated into national legislation.
That legal gap is becoming increasingly important as African countries seek to make the AfCFTA work in practice. According to Thanay, interoperability often fails not because the technology is unavailable, but because countries lack agreements allowing them to recognize and accept each other’s data, mutually recognize Authorised Economic Operator status and establish appropriate data protection arrangements.
Rules of origin provide another example of the distance between continental agreements and their practical implementation. In February 2026, the African Union Assembly adopted the final outstanding rules of origin for automotive products, clothing and textiles, completing the AfCFTA’s rules of origin framework. But a rule only becomes useful to traders when it is incorporated into national tariff schedules, customs systems and certificate verification procedures.
Africa’s fragmented customs environment adds another layer of complexity. Countries have developed their own procedures, data standards and information systems, often at different times and for different national requirements. Systems designed to meet one administration’s revenue and compliance priorities may not communicate easily with those of a neighboring country.
The economic stakes are significant. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development estimates that addressing non-tariff barriers could generate approximately $20 billion a year for African economies, more than five times the estimated $3.6 billion benefit from eliminating tariffs.
National single-window systems have already delivered improvements in several African countries by allowing traders to interact with multiple government agencies through a single platform. But these systems often stop at the national border. Without an outbound mechanism capable of transmitting declaration data to the next customs administration, the process can revert to manual checks once goods cross into another country.
The challenge also extends beyond customs authorities. Standards agencies, food and drug regulators, phytosanitary authorities and port-health services can all contribute to delays. The World Customs Organization’s Time Release Study provides a framework for identifying where those delays occur, making it an important tool for measuring the impact of interoperability initiatives.
Africa has already demonstrated that cross-border data exchange can work. The ECOWAS SIGMAT transit system was operating across nine member states by May 2025, when Benin and Nigeria launched an interconnection at the Sèmè-Kraké border. In September 2026, the two administrations went further with a Customs Declaration Exchange System pilot connecting Benin’s Customs Webb system with Nigeria’s B’Odogwu platform.
The system allows Nigerian customs officers to access declarations submitted in Benin, including manifests, transit information and risk alerts, while each country retains responsibility for its own duty calculations, risk assessments and release procedures. The initiative represents a practical example of federated interoperability along the Abidjan-Lagos corridor, which Nigerian Customs says accounts for approximately 70 percent of West Africa’s transit trade.
Other regional initiatives demonstrate similar potential. The East African Community’s Single Customs Territory enables declaration-data sharing and cargo tracking across major corridors, while COMESA’s transit guarantee system allows goods to move across multiple countries under a single bond.
The difficulty is scaling these successes across the continent. Connecting two customs administrations can take years of legal, technical and operational work. With 54 African countries, a fully bilateral approach could theoretically create 1,431 possible country-to-country connections, each requiring separate negotiations, technical mapping, maintenance and testing.
A continental approach would reduce that complexity by establishing common standards that countries can implement once rather than requiring individual technical agreements with every trading partner.
The World Customs Organization Data Model already provides a common vocabulary, code lists and message structures for customs information exchange. The challenge is that national implementations often diverge from the model because countries add local requirements, retain legacy systems or lack documentation for older platforms.
Technology, including machine learning, could help address some of these challenges by identifying potential connections between undocumented legacy systems and the WCO Data Model, interpreting field meanings and maintaining mappings as systems evolve.
However, artificial intelligence should not be allowed to independently rewrite legally binding customs declarations during the clearance process. Any transformation of declarations must be deterministic, version-controlled, logged and auditable. Machine learning can assist with building and maintaining mappings, but the actual exchange should rely on published and controlled mappings that customs authorities can verify.
The preferred architecture for Africa is therefore not a centralized continental customs database but a federated system in which each country retains control of its own systems and data while connecting through common standards and secure interfaces.
That approach also reflects the legal and political sensitivity of customs information. Customs data is fiscal information and is subject to confidentiality requirements and national regulations in many African jurisdictions. Countries are therefore unlikely to support a system that requires them to surrender control of their national data.
Federation, however, requires governance. A continental system needs an institution capable of determining what information should be shared, establishing standards and resolving disputes. The AfCFTA Secretariat, working with the World Customs Organization and the Regional Economic Communities, could provide the institutional framework for a continental exchange standard and dispute-resolution mechanism.
Without such coordination, every new interoperability project risks becoming another bilateral negotiation, adding technical complexity and increasing the cost of implementation. Cybersecurity will also become increasingly important as more customs and revenue systems become interconnected, expanding the potential attack surface of critical national infrastructure.
Africa can also learn from failed attempts at creating large-scale digital trade platforms. TradeLens, developed by Maersk and IBM as a blockchain-enabled platform for global trade, was discontinued in 2023 despite the underlying technology functioning. One of the lessons was that interoperability platforms depend on achieving sufficient participation. The first country or company to connect gains limited value unless other participants join.
For Africa, this means interoperability projects will require clear institutional ownership, deadlines, funding and measurable outcomes. One priority would be for the AfCFTA Secretariat, WCO and Regional Economic Communities to establish a single continental profile of the WCO Data Model as the required exchange format, supported by a common conformance test.
A second priority would be developing model legal agreements for cross-border data exchange and mutual recognition of Authorised Economic Operator programmes. Establishing these legal foundations could remove some of the biggest obstacles to implementation.
Two live trade corridors could then be selected for intensive testing, with their performance measured through Time Release Studies before and after interoperability is introduced. Metrics such as the percentage of consignments whose data is reused across borders and reductions in cargo-release times would provide tangible evidence of whether the system is working.
Payment infrastructure will also need to develop alongside customs interoperability. Connecting digital trade systems with the Pan-African Payment and Settlement System could help ensure that payments move as efficiently as the information supporting the transaction.
The digital transformation of African trade must also account for small and informal traders. Many cross-border traders operate outside large formal supply chains, with women representing a significant share of informal trade in many parts of the continent. Without simplified procedures, appropriate low-value thresholds, reliable connectivity and accessible digital infrastructure, interoperability could primarily benefit large formal companies rather than broadening participation in intra-African trade.
Infrastructure remains a fundamental requirement. Reliable electricity, broadband connectivity, modern hardware and technical capacity at border posts must be treated as long-term infrastructure investments rather than secondary components of digital trade projects.
Africa already has much of the technology and many of the standards required to make cross-border digital trade work. It also has functioning examples of regional interoperability developed by African institutions. What remains is to establish clear continental ownership of the standards, create the necessary legal mechanisms and provide sustained funding for implementation.
The challenge facing Africa’s digital trade ambitions is therefore not simply a technological one. It is fundamentally a question of governance, coordination and political commitment. If countries can make their systems communicate as effectively as their trade agreements, the AfCFTA could move closer to its promise of a truly integrated continental market.
For now, Africa’s goods can cross borders more easily than the data that describes them. Closing that gap may be one of the most important steps toward making the continent’s digital trade ambitions a reality.